🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the crisis triggered by the introduction of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – momentarily – to have been defused. A Washington representative spoke of "substantial progress" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its retaliation: an extensive attack of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Peace Talks and Military Action

The succession of opposing developments captured the harsh reality of the recent timeframe. By day, political struggles are waged: hopeful statements are issued from various governments. Immense energy is devoted on managing specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin brutally reminds the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the main instrument for achieving "settlement".

After-Dark Attacks

As military strikes developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's exposure was revealed. Ukraine is able to track rocket firings from Russian territory, a capability provided through current data. From observation points, military aircraft that had been dispatched to counter approaching guided weapons streaked across the sky – sophisticated military planes provided to Ukraine by NATO members.

Soon thereafter, Kyiv's air-defence systems thundered: defensive missiles fired to intercept a hostile projectile. This was a modern interception technology at work, most likely delivered by Western nations. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, shaking the windows. The brief panic quickly transforms into resigned acknowledgment: perhaps the hostile projectile won't hit its mark this time, sparing the city from ruin and another blackout.

Persistent Threats

Soon after, a heavy machine gun fired at a aerial vehicle somewhere nearby, part of a defensive team – most likely Western-made equipment. Regrettably, the shots failed to hit the enemy aircraft – it pressed on overhead toward its target.

Periodically, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the early updates: multiple fatalities, damage and infrastructure problems in many homes as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As typically, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those entire period illustrated Ukraine's essential dependence on international aid – a reliance that European nations are evidently unprepared to fill in the immediate future.

Failed Diplomacy

The detailed framework from American leadership sparked intense emotion, discussion and serious worry – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after earlier high-level meetings and multilateral gatherings.

Every new proposal from American administration unfolds according to the identical sequence: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, effectively counters. They stabilise the situation but never actually achieve victory. This cycle will, certainly, continue.

Political Considerations

It is tempting to accuse certain parties of persistently promoting Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. US administration functions according to a principle familiar among experienced diplomats: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have lost on the battlefield. The American government presumes that it is impossible to pressure the Kremlin to surrender the land that it currently occupies in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The challenge is that while recognising this factual reality, American administration does minimal to prevent Kremlin actions, through statements or actions, from assuming that the situation will not shift further in its benefit in the coming year.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, Russian leadership is convinced that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its partners are nearing depletion. Their reason to agree to terms that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is close to zero. There may be numerous efforts to achieve ceasefire, but they will continue as long as Russia's government remains completely certain in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still endure, slowly losing people and territory but averting a total frontline collapse until conditions improve in its advantage.

Existing Situation

Objectively, there are no actual prerequisites for a armistice. Now, personal considerations are coming into play: personal goals to negotiate peace and achieve global acclaim, and the government's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to unite the population around the national cause against any initiative Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their priority does not move to internal issues. And although their objective will now be much harder after latest incidents, it remains quite doubtful that this will modify their basic position.

These opposing factors are driving the talks.

Assessment and Future

It took a mere seven days to terminate the suggested clauses of the most recent proposal. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by American leadership, pushback by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with calming attempts of representatives, and finally, latest revelations, all did their job.

While new initiatives based on old ideas are approaching, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter diplomatic offensives from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and reflect certain reluctance to change the course of events, if they stand together and strengthen their defence capabilities at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to defend against evening bombardments will, for the predictable period, mainly require sustained allied backing.